Introducing the MUMC Rogaine Leaderboard!

Rogaining is a one of the club's most popular sports, with over 70 members having participated in official events over 2026. With so many people engaging in the sport, the question naturally arises, 'Who is the best?'. While the point is to have fun, not to win, where's the harm in some competitive spirit?

Our current leaders are:

  • Open: Lingshu Liu (278.6 Points*)
  • U23: Roland Cameron (268.92 Points*)

*Our scoring approach is an in-house formula that aims to reward both high-scoring and high-participation. See the methodology section below for further information.

Leaderboard

Last updated 20th October

Rank           Name                                       # Events (Wins)            Points

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

24

25

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

33

33

33

33

33

34

34

34

35

36

37

38

38

39

39

40

41

42

42

43

44

45

46

46

46

47

47

48

48

48

49

49

50

51

51

51

51

52

53

53

54

55



Lingshu Liu

Roland Cameron

Lucy Russ

Gleb Belov

Robert Springer

Charlotte Buckingham

Geraint Carrington

Aurelia Wilson

Barney Cox

Rose Henry

Callum Peden

Thijs Liebregts

Alex Ciocan

Mia Klein

Felix Schaap

James Birrell 

Isaac Miles-fine

Nikita Bulach

Kieren Rungapadiachy

Vishal Katwe

Henry Huang

Eleanor March

William Moran

Rupert Sternson

Joshua Banks

Scott Moore

Jason Jin

Aiden Martin

Hannah Bradley

Oliver Gill

Andrew Barrett

Anthony James

Dominic Bongiorno

Aidan Fryer

Zeping Xu

Zara Pettifer

Paries Wiese

Madeline Jelleff

Rhianna Tan

Zachary Beaumont

Remy Grutzner

Andrew Ward

Alexander El-Khoury

Luis Smith

Oliver Daniels

Lily Hall

Toby Hallebone

Jack Holloway

Isabella Baluch

Emma Ferris

Callum Edwards

Raymond Choo

Becky Spain

Ryunosuke Himeda

Emilianio Leal

David Platzner

Jovan Stefanoski

Alma Samocha

Tom Woodruff

Jess Vinnicombe

Liam Fitzgerald

Eddie Truong

Yennifer Jiang

Darcery Delagnes

Khalid Steitie

Jayden White

Aideen Gallagher

Anna Ruegg

Gina Snelling

David Crowe

Elisa P

Kiefer Bedoya

Zabrina Schuurman

Nick Kluckow

Caitlin Hall

Eleanor Ross

Leqi Qian

Jason Lu



5

3 (2)

5 (1)

4

3

3 (1)

4

3

2 (1)

3

2 (1)

2

4

1 (1)

1 (1)

2

2

3

1

1

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

2

2

2

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1



278.6

268.92

229.37

214.55

208.52

191.83

183.4

171.96

168.92

163.96

143.79

120.91

101.21

100

100

95.8

93.54

84.38

83.23

80.06

79.74

78.91

73.41

66.64

64

64

55.86

55.86

53.49

49.39

49.18

46.66

41.37

40.55

39.16

37.27

37.27

37.27

37.27

37.27

37.27

35.28

35.28

35.28

34.6

34.23

33.12

31.12

31.12

29.75

29.75

27.66

24.36

23.88

23.88

22.44

21.4

19.9

16.31

16.31

16.31

16.17

16.17

15.58

15.58

15.58

12.43

12.43

12.1

12.08

12.08

12.08

12.08

10.28

9.54

9.54

7.95

7.36






Methodology

Formula: (Points Scored in Event / Points Scored by Winner of Event)^2 * 100

Why this formula?

We want to reward both participation and overall wins for rogaines. While a simple sum could achieve this it doesn't accurately reflect two key concepts:

  1. Rogaines aren't usually comparable. Scoring 3,000 points at a metrogaine is very different to scoring 3,000 points at the 24hr Vic Championships. Therefore we needed to normalise the scoring. This is achieved by dividing a person's score by the maximum score achieved on the course for that event.
  2. We took a normative view that someone who wins 1 event is a 'better' rogainer than someone who scores 50% of the possible points at 2 events. Thus, the normalised scores could not simply be added together but rather needed to be adjusted to offer more points for scoring higher. We landed on an exponential to achieve this. Therefore, points are awarded based on the following:
% of Event Points            50%      60%      70%      80%     90%      100%
Leaderboard Points2536496481100

Overall, we believe this methodology strikes the right balance to reward participation and achievement. We are open to comments and suggestions and if you believe that you have been scored incorrectly, please reach out to and .